Aoristos
’
s Blog
September 12, 2019 9:12 PM
![Dear Guest of this web site,
I have incorporated herein, below, a blog-entry authored by my colleague, Miguel Detonacciones, and posted, earlier, to his ‘F.E.D. Dialectics’ blog.
The version pasted-in below has incorporated some further edits suggested by the E.D. Editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for Encyclopedia Dialectica [E.D.], beyond those that were included in the original blog-entry.
Enjoy!
Dialogically yours,
Aoristos Dyosphainthos,
Voting Member, F.E.D. General Council,
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Chief, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.
Part 09: Seldon’s ‘‘‘Seeings’’’ Series -- Ontological Self-Diversification Captured via ‘Self-Iterated’ Self-Reflexive Self-Involution of the «Arché»-Category’s Symbol’.
Dear Reader,
It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.
The ninth such release in this new series is entered below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].
This 9th instalment addresses the root of the dialectical principle of ‘Meta-Genealogy’.
Seldon:
“...What the Dyadic and Triadic «aufheben»-functions [E.D. Editors: What we -- all except for Seldon himself -- call ‘the Dyadic and Triadic Seldon Functions’.] describe is the ontological self-diversification of within a given [sub-]universe[-of-discourse] that results from self-iterated, self-reflexive, self-refluxive, «aufheben» self-involution, beginning from the ‘ultimate ancestor’ ontology, or ‘«arché»-ontology’, of that [sub-]universe or Domain.”
“...Indeed, it is this ‘ontological self-diversification’ which creates what we call a ‘meta-genealogy’ -- a [generally] non-DNA-based, more comprehensive sort of ‘‘‘genealogy’’’.”
“...In such, the ‘dialectical or «aufheben» self-diversification of the «arché» population of a given Encyclopedia Dialectica-identified Domain’, D, ‘self-continuates’ -- beyond its stage 1 or epoch 1 -- beyond Dτ2 = 1, or Dτ3 = 1, in terms of its Domain’s ‘dialectical meta-model’, thus modeling the creation of a ‘meta-lineage’, a non-DNA-based ontological lineage.”
“...As such, in that ‘meta-lineage’, every successive ontological kind is ‘familialy’ connected -- connected by ancestry -- all the way back to the «arché» kind, so that, explicitly, every successive ontological kind is already connected to every other that irrupted into existence before it, either by way of ontological, «aufheben» ‘auto-hybridization’ [e.g., by ‘self-meta-unit-ization’] or by way of ontological, «aufheben» ‘allo-hybridization’...”
“This way of describing the process sounds like this description holds only for diachronic, ‘“historical dialectics”’.”
“But synchronic, ‘“systematic dialectics”’ follow a parallel course, at their most abstract, generic root.”
For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics.org/
and
www.dialectics.info
For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH?ref=search_shop_redirect
¡ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel Detonacciones,
Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.](12_Entry_1_files/shapeimage_3.png)
