Aoristos’s Blog

 
Part 07: Seldon’s ‘‘‘Seeings’’’ Series -- Planet-Formation & ‘«aufheben» meta-monad-ization’.
 
Dear Guest of this web site, I have incorporated herein, below, a blog-entry authored by my colleague, Miguel Detonacciones, and posted, earlier, to his ‘F.E.D. Dialectics’ blog. The version pasted-in below has incorporated some further edits suggested by the E.D. Editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for Encyclopedia Dialectica [E.D.], beyond those that were included in the original blog-entry. Enjoy!   Dialogically yours, Aoristos Dyosphainthos, Voting Member, F.E.D. General Council, Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison, Chief, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison. Part 07: Seldon’s ‘‘‘Seeings’’’ Series -- Planet-Formation & ‘«aufheben» meta-monad-ization’. 
 Dear Reader, It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon. The seventh such release in this new series is entered below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse]. This 7th instalment addresses the self-iterated, dialectical -- i.e., the «aufheben», ‘meta-monad-ization’, ‘onto-dynamical’ character -- of initial planet-formation processes, of, e.g., “pebble accretion”, and beyond. Seldon: “Per present knowledge, planets are made up out of a heterogeneous multiplicity of ‘metafinite’ “collisional” singularities.” “There is a self-progression of “electrostatically” and gravitationally self-re-iterated stages of subn-planetary formation, by means of dialectical, or «aufheben», collisional ‘meta-unit-ization’ of subn+1-planetary formations.” “Once this Nature-dialectic-al process gets going, each ‘subn-planet unit’ is a ‘meta1-subn+1-planet meta-unit’, made up out of a heterogeneous multiplicity of ‘subn+1-planet units’, each of which is a ‘meta1-subn+2-planet meta-unit’, and so on, down to the ultimate «arché» of planet-formation, e.g., “dust grains”.” “We can roughly describe a self-progression of pre-planetary-to-planetary ontology, at least local to our Solar System, during the sequence of epochs of its formation/‘onto-dynamasis’, as -- “dust grains”... ...“planetesimals”... ...‘‘‘planetary embryos’’’... ...planets.” “Note also that this is another case of the apparently sometimes ‘internally erasive/internally-quasi-convolute’ «aufheben»-conservation aspect of such, ‘Nature-al’, ‘meta-unit-ization’ dialectic, which is still mostly ‘‘‘evolute’’’/non-erasive externally.” “That is, with the human sensorium and with the instruments which, presently, extend it, it is, in some ways, easier to determine that there are atom units still inside -- still internal to -- their molecule ‘meta-units’, as immediate ‘meta-atomic’ units, than it is to determine that there are [modified] ‘‘‘pebbles’’’ still extant inside their “pebble-accreted” ‘‘‘planetesimal’’’ ‘meta-units’; [modified] ‘‘‘planetesimals’’’ still inside their ‘‘‘planetary embryo’’’ ‘meta-units’; [modified] ‘‘‘proto-planets’’’, ‘‘‘planetary embryos’’’, or ‘‘‘dwarf planets’’’, still inside their planet ‘meta-units’, or, in another Domain, that of human-social formation(s), e.g., to discern that there are still [modified] primeval hunter-gatherer “camp” ‘meta1-units’ ‘‘‘dissolved’’’ inside ancient village ‘meta2-units’, and that there are even more-primordial [modified] nomadic hunter-gatherer-scavenger “band” ‘meta0-units’, or ‘«arché»-units’ -- ‘‘‘dissolved’’’ -- ‘‘‘inside’’’ those primeval hunter-gatherer “camp” ‘meta1-units’.” “Externally, there are, at least in our Solar System, still instrumentally discernible, remnants of that whole spectrum of stages of ‘proto-planetary’ [meta-]units -- “seeds” of planets -- e.g., among the “Kuiper Belt objects”, so that the external «aufheben»-conservation aspect of the evoluteness of this process of planet formation in our Solar System is still mostly ‘non-erasive’.” For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see -- http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics.org/ and www.dialectics.info For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see: https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH?ref=search_shop_redirect ¡ENJOY! Regards, Miguel Detonacciones, Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.], Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison, Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.
 JPG. http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics.org/http://www.dialectics.infohttps://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH?ref=search_shop_redirect19_Entry_1_files/F.E.D._,_%27Dialectogram%27_,_%27The_Systematic_Dialectic_of_CONvolutenesses_versus_Evolutenesses_versus_COvolutenesses%27_,_Step_1_,_TRIad_1_,_Last_Updated_24DEC2019.jpgshapeimage_3_link_0shapeimage_3_link_1shapeimage_3_link_2shapeimage_3_link_3

August 19, 2019 8:19 PM

 
 
Made on a Mac

next >

< previous