Aoristos
’
s Blog
May 19, 2012 8:20 PM
![Guests of the www.dialectics.org website,
The Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] ‘‘‘Psychohistorical-Dialectical Equations’’’ were designed, by the General Council of F.E.D., to create a ‘Time-Vault of the Future’, by means of an ‘Encyclopedia Dialectica’ ‘‘‘holodeck’’’ [cf. StarTrek, The Next Generation, +] ‘meta-planetarium projector’, named the ‘‘‘F.E.D. Prime Radiant’’’, to project 3-D holographic representations of the solution-scenarios of this system of “simultaneous” equations and their scenario-valued variables, for future values of their time-variables, i.e., to algorithmically ‘pre-construct’ dialectical-mathematically-generated richly-determinate imagery for the future history expected per these equations.
All but one of these seven equations utilize the ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ formulation of dialectical ontological progressions [ = of [revolutionary new] kinds-of-being progressions], a function which was defined earlier in this series, and which is also defined via the following link –
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Glossary_files/F.E.D.,%20A%20Dialectical%20%27%27Theory%20of%20Everything%27%27,%20Volume%200,%20FOUNDATIONS,%20Edition%201.00,%20last%20updated%2028OCT2011,%20Definition,%20SELDON%20FUNCTIONS,%20JPEG,%2029OCT2011_1.jpg
The F.E.D. General Council is thereby enabled to anticipate – in timing, and in event-content – approaching “Seldon Crises”, for more about which, in terms of their [science-]fictional instantiation by Isaac Asimov, see –
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seldon_Crisis
I have listed, below, this system of seven dialectical equations, which are to be solved ‘‘‘simultaneously’’’ for the new ontology possibly emergent during the time period, tx [denoting the generic ‘‘‘epoch’’’ of the dialectical progression denoted by x] of the future value of that time-period variable which is to be solved-for.
The versions of the F.E.D. ‘‘‘Psychohistorical-Dialectical Equations’’’ rendered and partially explicated further below, are all rendered in the rule-based ideographical algebraic language-system of the F.E.D. “First Dialectical Arithmetic / Algebra”, denoted by NQ_.
The nine core algorithms, rules, or “axioms” of this language, presented earlier in this series, are also available via the following links –
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Correspondence_files/Letter17-06JUN2009.pdf
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Dialectic_Ideography_files/6_Dialectics-Part1c-Briefing_OCR.pdf
[pp. I-144 through I-146].
The versions of these equations that are used by the ‘dialectical psychohistorians’ of the F.E.D. General Council, and that would be capable of driving the ‘‘‘F.E.D. Prime Radiant’’’, are formulated in a higher, richer dialectical language than that of the NQ, purely-qualitative algebra used here – a language that arises later in the dialectical, ‘ideo-ontological’ progression-presentation of the F.E.D. systems of dialectical language. Needless to say, this dialectical language is one of the ‘quanto-qualitative’, rather than one of the ‘purely-qualitative’, dialectical languages that arises in that progression.
We do not [yet] publicly disclose the rules-system of that dialectical language. The optimal historical timing of its disclosure is itself a matter for the most delicate psychohistorical-dialectical calculation. However, immediately below, I give a summary description of the early dialectical language systems in the order that they are covered in that dialectical-systematic presentation, a presentation which we can summarily model by a ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’-based dialectical equation, also formulated in the NQ dialectical language.
The generic [unspecified; unsolved] ontology symbols of the NQ dialectic are NQ = { q1, q2, q3, …}. The axiomatic system that governs the ‘algorithmics’ of these NQ ‘meta-numbers’ is denoted by NQ_.
The notational conventions adhered to herein, to the extent that the typographical limitations of this medium allow, are summarized here --
First Module
Second Module
Third Module
Fourth Module
In the sequel, we use the symbol ‘=’ to stand in place of the phrase “is equal to, by definition”.
The underscored mnemonic symbols stand for ‘dialectical meta-numbers’ – i.e., for purely-qualitative values that operate, arithmetically and algebraically, according to the F.E.D. ‘Fundamental Rule of Dialectical Logic’, a rule that was proven deductively here, from the NQ_ axioms, previously in this series.
Since all of the ‘F.E.D. Psychohistorical-Dialectical Equations’ are equations of ‘psychohistorical dialectics’, we use the assignment symbol ‘[--->’ to indicate an association of an unassigned, unsolved, or “generic” NQ ‘meta-natural meta-number’ to a specific, mnemonic [psycho]historical-dialectical ontological category symbol [“kind of being” symbol], within a given [psycho]historical-dialectical ‘[psycho]physio-ontological’ progression:
[interpreted/solved/specific historical category symbol] [---> [generic NQ ‘meta-number’ symbol], e.g. --
The <<Kapital>>-relation as a human[oid]-social relation of production <---> K [---> q16
However, for ‘pure idea-systems’, and for their presentational ‘ideo-ontological’ dialectical categorial progressions, we use the assignment symbol, or solution symbol, ‘[---)’, to indicate such associations, e.g. --
“Thesis” axioms-system; standard “Natural” numbers in 1st order specification; ‘pure-quantifier’ algebra (---) N_ [---) q1
“Antithesis” axioms-system; 1st order, non-standard, dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘pure-qualifier’ algebra (---) NQ_ [---) q2
The beginning – or «arche’» -- category and system of ‘ideas-ontology’ in the F.E.D. presentational-dialectical progression for the F.E.D. axioms-systems of dialectical arithmetic, is the system of the arithmetic of the “Natural” Numbers, N = {1, 2, 3, …}, as formulated by only the four Peano postulates that are expressible in “first order” formal symbolic logic [“first order” logic here means a language of formal logic that makes assertions about individual “Natural Numbers” only, but not about qualities shared by multiple “Natural Numbers”, such as “Even-ness”, “Odd-ness”, “Prime-ness”, “Composite-ness”, etc.]. We denote that “first-order” axioms-system of arithmetic by N_. It is a dialectical arithmetic only in a ‘pre-vestigial’, implicit, quantitative-only sense, in that the Peano successor function, s, is a degenerate, purely-quantitative «aufheben» operation: s(n) = n + 1, given an n in N.
The algorithm that generates this systems-progression is termed, by us, a ‘meta-model’, because a “model” would cover only a single system, whereas this progression contains a potentially infinite multitude of successive systems.
We use the term ‘‘‘evolution’’’ to describe the [self-]developmental dynamics within a single system, whether it be a natural, physical system [‘physio-system’], a human ideas-system [‘ideo-system’] such as a mathematical axiomatic system, or a human psychohistorical system – i.e., an ‘ideo-physio-system’ – such as a human socio-economic system. ‘‘‘Evolutions’’’ are transitions between historically successive states within a single system.
We therefore use the term ‘meta-evolution’ to describe the [revolutionary] transitions between systems – from historical predecessor system to historical successor system, which involve irruptions of new ontology.
The ‘Dyadic Seldon Function Meta-Model’ of the F.E.D. Method of Presentation [ = ‘Meta-Systematic Dialectic’] for this progression of dialectical-mathematical systems, is therefore –
(N_)^(2^s)
wherein s denotes a Whole Number variable, W = {0, 1, 2, 3, … }, representing/counting the cumulative number of steps into the exposition. Four steps in, i.e., for step s = 3, we solve this ‘meta-model’ as follows:
(N_)^(2^3) = (N_)^(8) = a non-amalgamative sum of 8 ‘idea-ontological’ categories, each connoting a qualitatively different, ‘ideo-ontologically’ different dialectical-mathematical axioms-system --
N_ + NQ_ + NU_ + NM_ + NqMN_ + NqMQ_+ NqMQN_+ NA_ [---)
q1 + q2 + q3 + q4 + q5 + q6 + q7 + q8.
These first eight axioms-systems of dialectical arithmetic can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘pure ideo-systems’ assignment symbol, ‘(---)’ --
N_ (---) Thesis system of standard natural numbers arithmetic in 1st order specification, as purely quantitative algebra.
NQ_ (---) 1st ‘Anti-thesis’ 1st order axioms-system, non-standard model of N_, 1st dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘pure-qualifier algebra’.
NU_ (---) 1st [full] ‘Synthesis’ system; 1st order, 2nd dialectical ‘meta-numbers’, ‘quantifiable <<monad>>-qualifier’ algebra.
NM_ (---) 2nd ‘Anti-thesis’ system of 1st order, 3rd dialectical ‘metrical qualifier meta-numbers’; purely qualitative algebra.
NqMN_ (---) Partial ‘synthesis’ system of 1st order, 4th dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘quantifiable metrical qualifiers’ algebra.
NqMQ_ (---) Partial ‘synthesis’, 1st order, 5th dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘compound unquantifiable metrical qualifiers’.
NqMQN_ (---) 2nd full ‘Synthesis’ system; fully-algorithmic “dimensional analysis” via quantifiable state-variable qualifiers algebra.
NA_ (---) 3rd ‘Anti-thesis’ system of 1st order, 7th dialectical ‘dynamical system-qualifiers’; purely qualitative algebra
[implicitly, but not yet explicitly, an ideography for dynamical [& ‘‘‘meta-dynamical’’’, super^0-meta-]systems].
The system of seven dialectical equations which constitute ‘the F.E.D. Psychohistorical-Dialectical Equations’ are:
1. The Equation of Human Ideology/Knowledge Meta-Evolution.
2. The Equation of Human-Social Forces of Production Meta-Evolution.
3. The Equation of Human-Social Relations of Production Meta-Evolution.
4. The Equation of Human-Social Formation(s) Meta-Evolution.
5. The Equation of Human Genome / Human ‘Phenome’ Meta-Evolution.
6. The Equation of the Meta-Evolution of Planetary Human[oid]ities.
7. The Equation of The Psychohistorical Dialectic of the Dialectic Itself.
The NQ_ and ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ formulation of these psychohistorical-dialectical equations can be rendered, and briefly described, as given below.
I. The Equation of Human Ideology/Knowledge Meta-Evolution
a. <<Arche’>>: Mythopoeias, M [---> q1.
b. ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula: <M>^(2^tk).
c. Solution to epoch tk = 4:
<M>^(2^4) = <M>^(16) =
M + R + qRM + P + qPM + qPR + qPRM + K +
qKM + qKR + qKMR + qKP + qKPM + qKPR + qKPRM + Y [--->
q1 + q2 + q3 + q4 + q5 + q6 + q7 + q8 + q9 + q10 + q11 + q12 + q13 + q14 + q15 + q16.
d. Key categories from the first sixteen categories of the fields/forms of human ideology/knowledge can be summarily described using the ‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘<--->’ and ‘[--->’ --
M <---> Mythopoeias, “Myth-Makings”; “Mythologies” [---> q1.
R <---> Religions, codified / standardized / dogmatized, i.e., ‘Meta-Mythopoeias’ [---> q2.
qRM <---> Reconciliations of R & M / conversions from M into R, e.g., Ancient Rome’s Pantheon [---> q3.
P <---> Philosophies, i.e., ‘Meta-Religions’ [---> q4.
.
.
.
qPR <---> R|P reconciliations, even qRP retrograde P to R conversion, e.g., Aquinas’ Summa Theologica [---> q6.
.
.
.
K <---> Scientific Knowledges, i.e., ‘Meta-Philosophies’ [---> q8.
.
.
.
qKPR <---> Includes qPRK partially retrograde K|R to P conversions, e.g., Hegel’s Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences [---> q14.
qKPRM <---> Advanced stage science, K, subsuming/explaining Philosophy, Religion, & Mythology [possible/not actual on Earth] [---> q15.
Y <---> ‘‘‘PsYchohistories’’’, i.e., ‘Meta-Sciences’, e.g., Marx’s theory [---> q16.
For more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical equation’’’, see –
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Primer_files/4_F.E.D.%20Intro.%20Letter,%20Supplement%20B-1,%20v.2_OCR.pdf
[pp. B-09 through B-17]
II. The Equation of Human-Social Forces of Production Meta-Evolution
a. <<Arche’>>: Whole [proto-]human communities [e.g., hunting bands] as Prime Energy Resources for
their own Human Societal Self-[Re-]Production, Rh [---> q1. This ‘meta-model’ uses somewhat different
notation than the others, because it is not ‘meta-monadic’ in the usual sense, but, on the contrary, recapitulates the ‘meta-monadology’ of the ‘Dialectical Theory of Everything’ self-construction of the cosmos in reverse. The deeper/earlier reaches of the ontology of the cosmos become accessible, for human Appropriation, as energy Resources, in the reverse order of their formation, and, as such energy Resources, form the core of the Marxian “social forces of production”. We are using the term “energy Resources” here in a more concretely determinate, more specific, less ahistorically abstract, less reductionist sense of the term ‘‘‘energy’’’ than is usually the case in contemporary discourse.
b. ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula: <Rh>^(2^tf).
c. Solution to epoch tf = 4:
<Rh>^(2^4) = <Rh>^(16) =
Rh + Rl + Rlh + Rb + Rbh + Rbl + Rblh + Re +
Reh + Rel + Relh + Reb + Rebh + Rebl + Reblh + Rp [--->
q1 + q2 + q3 + q4 + q5 + q6 + q7 + q8 + q9 + q10 + q11 + q12 + q13 + q14 + q15 + q16.
d. Key categories from the first sixteen categories of ‘the existential self-force of human society’ -- of
‘human-societal self-reproductive self-force’ -- can be summarily described as follows, using the
‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘<--->’ and ‘[--->’ --
Rh <---> Entire [proto-]human communities [e.g., hunting bands] as prime energy Resource for predation-based social self-Re-production [---> q1.
Rl <---> Other proto-language-based animal societies/ plant communities, as human energy resources [---> q2.
Rlh <---> Reconciliations of Rl & Rh / conversions from Rh into Rl [---> q3, e.g., herding & horticulture.
Rb <---> asocial animals & multi-cellular/’meta-biotan’ animal bodies, including human slaves’ bodies,
as exploited energy Resources for human societal self-Reproduction, e.g., draft animals; slave rowers,
etc. [---> q4.
.
.
.
Re <---> eukaryotic cells as energy resources for human societal self-[re-]production [---> q8, e.g.,
breads/beers/wines/vinegars/cheeses/jerkies/yogurts/kefirs/pickles/chutneys, other “spoiled food”/fermented products, as a food preservation technology.
.
.
.
Rp <---> prokaryotic, e.g., anaerobic, cells as energies for social Reproduction [e.g., methane-generating “digesters”] [---> q16.
e. Categories of interest irrupting into possibility in later epochs, tf > 4 --
Rmb comprises much ancient Roman technology, up to, e.g., U.S. Civil War technology [---> q36:
Ancient Roman temples -- using stone [m]; “drum cranes” using wood [meta-biota, b], rope [b], & sinew [b].
Ancient Roman waterworks flour mills -- using stone [m]; water [m], grain [b], wood [b], rope [b], etc.
Ancient Roman aqueducts -- using stone [m]; “drum cranes” using wood [meta-biota, b], rope [b], & sinew [b].
Ancient Roman glassworks -- using stone [m]; fire [m], metal [m] tools, wood [b] tools & fuels, glass-sand [m], diamond [m] cutting tools, etc., including to produce unsurpassed “Portland vases” and “caged glass”.
circa 200 B.C.E.+ Chinese / Japanese “Magic Mirrors” -- using metals [m], fire [m], intensive hand polishing [b].
17th Century Japanese <<karakuri>> doll automatons [mechanical robots] -- using wood [b], metal [m] springs, etc.
Ancient Roman <<ballista>> catapults -- using stone missiles [m]; wood [b], plant fiber/hair rope [b], & sinew [b].
Ancient Roman <<hypocaust>> public baths -- using stone [m]; “drum cranes” [b], wood [b] parts & fuels, & fire [m], water [m], air [m], clay [m] pipes, socializing human beings [h], etc.: <---> Rmbh [---> q37.
Bushnell’s “Turtle” single-occupant proto-submarine, U. S. First Revolutionary War vintage -- tar [b], wood [b], cork [b], flint [m], glass [m], lead [m], steel [m] bands, trapped water[m], trapped air [m], black powder [m], human-muscle-powered [hand-cranked] propeller [b].
• Confederate H. L. Hunley eight-person crew “fish boat”, “torpedo boat”, or “torpedo fish” proto-submarine, vintage U. S. Second Revolutionary [“Civil”] War -- wood [b], rope [b], rubber [b], glass [m], iron [m], copper [m] wire, “blue light” pyrotechnic signal flare [m], trapped water[m], trapped air [m], black powder [m], eight-persons “social” crew, with a seven-persons-hand-cranked propeller [h]: <---> Rmbh [---> q37; both steam-powered [m] and electrical motored [s] propulsion was tried, but failed; there are possible recently-discovered archaeological indications of chemical/molecular battery-powered electrical [s] torpedo detonation: <---> Rsmbh [---> q165.
Rsmh encompasses much recent ‘‘‘android robotics’’’ technology [---> q161:
• Tokyo University of Science, Dr. Hiroshi Kobayashi’s <<Saya>> android proto-robot, using electronics [s], metals [m], human behaviors [h], etc.
Rsmeb encompasses much recent ‘‘‘Genetically-Modified Organisms’’’ [GMO] technology [---> q172:
• Japanese interferon-producing GMO silk worms, created using electronics [s], metals [m], silk worm eukaryotic cell nucleus [e] DNA [m], silkworms [b], etc.
Rsam encompasses many recent designs for subluminal interstellar drive engines [---> q224:
• Ion engines, using electronics [s], [ionized] atoms [a], metals parts [m], etc.
Rnsam encompasses much now-emergent or speculative technology [---> q480:
• Dr. Robert Bussard’s “polywell” fusion power reactor, involving photons [n], atomic [sub-]orbitals’ electrons [s], ionized [plasma] atoms [a], and metal parts [m], etc.
• “Stellar Wind Sail” subluminal starship designs, using solar/stellar photon [n] winds, &/or “particle” winds [s], “atom” [ion] plasma winds [a], metal parts [m], etc.
• F.E.D. ‘tachyonic meta-phase’ superluminal interstellar-drive design-hypothesis described earlier in this series.
III. The Equation of Human-Social Relations of Production Meta-Evolution
a. <<Arche’>>: Appropriations [of products of pre-/extra-human Nature, in “raw” form], A [---> q1.
b. ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula: <A>^(2^tr).
c. Solution to epoch tr = 4:
<A>^(2^4) = <A>^(16) =
A + G + qGA + C + qCA + qCG + qCGA + M +
qMA + qMG + qMGA + qMC + qMCA + qMCG + qMCGA + K [--->
q1 + q2 + q3 + q4 + q5 + q6 + q7 + q8 + q9 + q10 + q11 + q12 + q13 + q14 + q15 + q16.
d. Key categories from the first sixteen categories of human ideology/knowledge can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘<--->’ and ‘[--->’ --
A <---> “Raw” Appropriations, “Predations” [---> q1.
G <---> Goods Production, ‘multi-appropriations’ [e.g., burins from glassy stones]; ‘Meta-Appropriations’ [---> q2.
qGA <---> Reconciliations of G & A / conversions from A into G [---> q3, e.g., spears applied in hunting.
C <---> Bartered Commodities, i.e., ‘Meta-Goods’ [---> q4.
.
.
.
M <---> Monies, i.e., ‘Meta-Commodities’ [---> q8.
.
.
.
qMC <---> Subsumption of Commodities by Monies, i.e., Monies-mediated circulations of Commodities [---> q12.
.
.
.
K <---> <<Kapitals>>, i.e., ‘Meta-Monies’ [---> q16.
e. Categories of interest, observed as having, or predicted to, irrupt into possibility in later epochs, tr > 4 --
qKG <---> Real subsumption/reshaping of Goods-production by the <<Kapital>>-relation; & including <<Kapital>> Goods [---> q18.
qKC <---> Real subsumption of the Commodity-relation by the <<Kapital>>-relation; includes “Commodity <<Kapital>>” [---> q20.
qKM <---> Real subsumption of the Money-relation by the <<Kapital>>-relation; includes “Money <<Kapital>>” [---> q24.
qKK <---> E <---> Self-subsumption of the <<Kapital>>-relation; The Generalized ‘Equity-arian’ ‘Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’ of “the associated producers” [Marx], i.e., ‘Democratic Communism’ [---> q32. See --
http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy.htm
http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicLawOfMotion/PoliticalEconomicLawOfMotion.htm
For more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical equation’’’, see –
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Primer_files/4_F.E.D.%20Intro.%20Letter,%20Supplement%20B-1,%20v.2_OCR.pdf
[pp. B-24 through B-38]
IV. The Equation of Human-Social Formation(s) Meta-Evolution
a. <<Arche’>>: bands/extended families of hunter-gathers/scavengers/foragers/predators, b [---> q1.
b. ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula: <b>^(2^tm).
c. Solution to epoch tm = 4:
<b>^(2^4) = <b>^(16) =
b + c + qcb + v + qvb + qvc + qvcb + f +
qfb + qfc + qfcb + qfv + qfvb + qfvc + qfvcb + s [--->
q1 + q2 + q3 + q4 + q5 + q6 + q7 + q8 + q9 + q10 + q11 + q12 + q13 + q14 + q15 + q16.
d. Key categories from the first sixteen categories of human social/‘meta-geological’ formation(s) can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘<--->’ and ‘[--->’ --
b <---> bands/extended families of hunter-gathers/scavengers/foragers/predators [---> q1.
c <---> camps, ‘multi-band’ semi-permanent home bases; ‘meta-bands’ [---> q2.
qcb <---> Reconciliations/hybridizations of c & b / conversions from b into c [---> q3, e.g., advantaged, expanding camps.
v <---> villages, ‘multi-camp’, long-duration settlements, ‘meta-camps’ [---> q4.
.
.
.
f <---> chiefdoms, multi-village, “tribal” domains; ‘meta-villages’ [---> q8.
.
.
.
s <---> city-states, i.e., ‘meta-chiefdom’, or ‘meta-tribal’, social formations [---> q16.
e. Categories of interest, observed as having, or predicted to, irrupt into possibility in later epochs, tm > 4 --
e <---> empires, multi-city-state ‘meta-city-states’ [---> q32.
n <---> nation-states, multi-empire-remnant ‘meta-empires’ [---> q64.
p <---> planetary-poli, multi-nation-state ‘meta-nation-states’ [not yet known extant] [---> q128.
m <---> multi-planetary federations; ‘meta-planetary-poli’ [not yet known extant] [---> q256.
For more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical equation’’’, see –
Robert Wright, NONZERO: The Logic of Human Destiny, Pantheon [New York: 2000],
pp. 20, 78-92, 102, 109, 110-111, 12, 113, 125, 165, 353, 355, 357, 363, 365, 368, 376, 402, etc.
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Primer_files/4_F.E.D.%20Intro.%20Letter,%20Supplement%20B-1,%20v.2_OCR.pdf
[p. B-23]
http://www.adventures-in-dialectics.org/Adventures-In-Dialectics/DiaRith/Intro/Dialectical-Ideography_An-Introductory-Letter.htm#Example_5
http://www.adventures-in-dialectics.org/Adventures-In-Dialectics/DiaRith/Intro/Dialectical-Ideography_An-Introductory-Letter.htm#An_Ideography_for_Example_5
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Briefs_files/F.E.D.-Brief2-part3-07DEC2008_OCR.pdf
http://www.adventures-in-dialectics.org/Adventures-In-Dialectics/Dialectical_Pictography/Dialectical_Pictography.htm
[slides 54-59]
V. The Equation of Human Genome / Human ‘Phenome’ Meta-Evolution
a. «Arche’»: The human Genome, as a mediately[ ‘Darwinianly’]-developing meta-system, from its proto-human origin , G [---> q1.
b. ‘Triadic Seldon Function’ Formula: <G>^(3^1).
c. Solution to epoch tG = 1:
<G>^(3^1) = <G>^(3) =
G + P + qPG [---> q1 + q2 + q3.
d. The categories of human genomic/human phenomic ‘co-meta-evolution’ can be summarily described
as follows, using the ‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘<--->’ and ‘[--->’ --
G <---> The ‘meta-evolving’ “human Genome” [---> q1.
P <---> The ‘meta- evolving’ ‘human Phenome’ of non-chromosomal, non-genotypic, phenotypic, cultural, “acquired characteristics” [---> q2.
qPG <---> Their ‘‘‘co-meta-evolving’’’ hybrid; the ‘‘‘complex unity’’’ of the human Phenome/human Genome [---> q3.
For more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical equation’’’, see –
http://point-of-departure.org/Point-Of-Departure/ClarificationsArchive/PsychoHistory/PsychoHistory.htm
VI. The Equation of the Meta-Evolution of Planetary Human[oid]ities
a. <<Arche’>>: Planetary ‘humanitys’, h [---> q1.
b. ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula: <h>^(2^th).
c. Solution to epoch th = 1:
<h>^(2^1) = <h>^(2) = h + Δh =
h + y [---> q1 + q2.
d. The two ‘[psycho]physio-ontological categories’ for this meta-evolution of planetary human[oid]ities equation, and the three sub-categories of the second-to-emerge into possibility of those categories, can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘<--->’ and ‘[--->’ --
h <---> ‘planetized’ ‘humanitys’ [or ‘planetized human[oid]ities’] [---> q1.
Δh <---> y <---> ‘meta-humanitys’ [---> q2; a ‘taxonomy level 1’ «genos» with 3 «species» --
<g>^(3^tg) = <g>^(3^1) = <g>^(3) =
g + r + qrg = g + r + c [---> q1 + q2 + q3 --
g <---> ‘Thesis’ <<species>>: ‘meta-humanity’ via human-genomic self-re-engineering [---> q1.
r <---> ‘Antithesis’ <<species>>: ‘meta-humanity’ via android robotics [---> q2.
qrg <---> c <---> ‘Synthesis’ <<species>>: ‘‘‘complex unity’’’ of r & g;
‘meta-humanity’ via cyborg prosthetics/bionics [---> q3.
For more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical equation’’’, see –
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Dialectic_Ideography_files/DI_Prolegomena-Epitome-24OCT2009.pdf
[p. I-19]
VII. The Equation of The Psychohistorical Dialectic of the Dialectic Itself
a. <<Arche’>>: Systematic / Synchronic Dialectics, S [---> q1.
b. ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula: <S>^(2^t#).
c. Solution to epoch t# = 2:
<S>^(2^2) = <S>^(4) =
S + qSS + qSSS + qSSSS =
qS + qH + qHS + qHH = qS + qD + qDS + qDD =
S + H + M + Y [---> q1 + q2 + q3 + q4.
d. These four ‘human-historical ideo-ontological’ categories of Dialectics can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘[psycho]historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘<--->’ and ‘[--->’ --
S <---> Systematic / Synchronic Dialectics, S [---> q1.
H <---> Historical / Diachronic Dialectics, H [---> q2.
M <---> Meta-Systematic / Diachronico-Synchronic Dialectics, M [---> q3.
Y <---> PsYchohistorical Dialectics, Y [---> q4.
For more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical equation’’’, see –
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Correspondence_files/F.E.D.,Letter%2007,Postludes%20Series,Postlude%20VII,The%20Dialectic%20of%20the%20Dialectic%20Itself,F.E.D.%20to%20Webmaster,www.dialectics.org,18AUG2011.pdf
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Glossary_files/F.E.D.,%20A%20Dialectical%20%27%27Theory%20of%20Everything%27%27,%20Volume%200,%20FOUNDATIONS,%20Edition%201.00,%20last%20updated%2014SEP2011,%20Definition,%20SYSTEMATIC%20DIALECTICS,%20JPEG,%20for%2015SEP2011.jpg
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Glossary_files/F.E.D.,%20A%20Dialectical%20%27%27Theory%20of%20Everything%27%27,%20Volume%200,%20FOUNDATIONS,%20Edition%201.00,%20last%20updated%2015SEP2011,%20Definition,%20HISTORICAL%20DIALECTICS,%20JPEG,%20for%2016SEP2011.jpg
http://point-of-departure.org/Point-Of-Departure/ClarificationsArchive/MetaSystematicDialectics/MetaSystematicDialectics.htm
http://point-of-departure.org/Point-Of-Departure/ClarificationsArchive/PsychohistoricalDialectics/PsychohistoricalDialectics.htm
Key challenges for the “simultaneous” and ‘quanto-qualitative’ solution of these seven equations –
1. Coordinating/correlating the different ‘‘‘tempos’’’ / temporalities / ‘epochalities’ of these equations, since,
in general, tk ~= tf ~= tr ~= tm ~= tG ~= th ~= tg ~= t#;
2. Modeling the thus coordinated quantitative ‘epochality’ using “continuous” rather than “discrete”
arithmetical models of time, e.g., using tR not in W; i.e., using tR in R = the set of the “Real” numbers;
3. Re-expressing the ‘quality meta-dynamics’, or ‘ontological meta-dynamics’, of the qualifier-sums in these
purely-qualitative, purely-ontological equations, more determinately, as ‘‘‘[space-]time-varying’’’ evolution
trajectory/path dynamics, with [‘metafinite’, ontologically-revolutionary] ‘‘‘singularities’’’, of time-function
quantified state-variables & control-parameters, using the higher dialectical-ideographical languages of
dynamical & ‘’‘meta-dynamical’’’ [super^z meta-]systems, via ‘singularity semantification’ [division-by-
zero ‘semantification’ and ‘metafinitization’];
Facilitated by 1. and 2., solving this system of seven equations “simultaneously”;
Modeling the ‘inter-mutual’ interactions of the co-existing actualities modeled by these seven equations;
6. Deriving a single equation which unifies / integrates all seven equations into a single ‘meta-equation’.
Dialogically yours,
Aoristos Dyosphainthos](19_The_F.E.D._Psychohistorical_Equations_files/shapeimage_3.png)
